Voice-over-IP (VoIP) has two components: (1) premises  equipment, such as IP telephones and switches, and (2) wide area network  facilities and equipment, such as gateways and VoIP cards in routers. Popular  publications sometimes confuse the subject by not distinguishing between the  two. In some cases, an IP-based PBX is cost-effective when VoIP over a wide area  network is not, and vice versa.
 A premises-based IP PBX has the following  advantages over the traditional, proprietary PBX:
 -  There is the potential to use a single wiring network for  both data and voice rather than separate, parallel wiring systems now used. 
-  Ease of move, add, change (MAC) within a building. Instead  of extensive administrative changes via a proprietary interface, the user's  telephone is simply moved from one office to another. Because each telephone set  has its own IP address, it rings at the right place as long as it is on the  organization's IP network. Some organizations spend thousands of dollars a month  on moves within a single building. 
-  Newer applications, such as unified messaging, are easier to  implement on IP-based systems. 
-  Capacity can be added in much smaller increments than with  traditional PBXs, which may require a new shelf, node, or even a complete  forklift upgrade. 
-  IP-based PBXs are generally more open and standards based,  holding out the promise of less costly hardware and software enhancements. 
-  Web-based applications can be easily linked with the IP  telephony world. For example, it is far less expensive to install "screen pops"  in an IP telephony environment than in traditional PBX systems. Sales personnel  and others who need information on the caller can benefit from such features.  Another example: an employee has a question about a 401K feature. He finds the  information in the organization's intranet Web page. He clicks on a "click to  talk" button and the appropriate party is dialed as he picks up his telephone to  talk. 
Despite these advantages, the IP PBX has a few limitations (at  least for the moment):
 -  IP PBXs have not yet scaled to thousands of users.  Nonetheless, each year the number of ports available on a single unit (such as  the 3COM NBX 100) continues to increase. 
-  The "tank-like" reliability of traditional vendors such as  Avaya, Nortel, and Siemens has not been achieved — at least in public  perception. Like PCs in the early days of the mainframe world, IP PBXs have to  evolve bullet-proof armor before Fortune 500 firms will trust their corporate  headquarters' voice system to a new technology. 
-  The huge installed base of legacy, proprietary PBX software  will need to be ported or developed for the IP world. That process is occurring  rapidly. 
-  Organizations with unreliable wiring or whose current  bandwidth is nearly occluded with data communications traffic (e.g., large file  transfers) may not have the building infrastructure to support voice over  data. 
 Exhibit 1 displays a  simplified diagram of an IP-based PBX. Note that multiple links are enabled —  traditional circuit switched (TDM) telephony, IP telephony via the LAN, and  links to the Internet.
 Exhibit 1: Example IP (LAN)-Based Telephone  System (Courtesy of AltiGen Communications.)   Although it is difficult to quantify the net economic effect, some  of the features provided by LAN telephony contribute to greater employee  productivity. Many of these features are available in traditional TDM telephony  systems, but at a higher cost. Examples include:
 -  Easy screen pops. When a customer  calls, a link is established between the incoming caller ID and a contact  package such as ACT!, Outlook, or Goldmine. Information from the contact  database is displayed immediately as the call comes in. 
-  Call handling. When an employee is on  the line and another call comes in, a graphical interface simplifies decision  making: the call can be ignored, accepted, routed to a queue for others to  handle, sent to voicemail, or added to a conference. The key difference from  past systems is that these features not only exist on less expensive platforms  but they are often displayed on a workstation screen. Hence, employees can  actually use the features on the system because the  interface is simpler. 
-  Simplified voicemail/unified  messaging. Users can use their workstation interface to listen, save, skip,  delete, and scroll through voicemail messages. Clicking on a stored message can  return calls. For those so inclined, messages can be saved as an Internet  standard WAV file or more compressed proprietary file and forwarded as an e-mail  attachment. 
To further illustrate some of the capabilities and benefits of  IP-based telephony, we can use the Siemens' optiPoint 100 advance IP telephone  (ww.siemens.com)  as a representative model. Siemens states that optiPoint provides for the  following features and benefits:
 -  Features: -  Hands-free and speakerphone 
-  Memory dial and redial 
-  Display of the incoming number (CLI) 
-  Call hold/consultation 
-  Alternate 
-  Call forwarding (CFU, CFB, CFNR) 
-  Call waiting 
-  Call transfer 
-  Call deflection (user-controlled forward) 
-  CTI interface allowing TAPI client control 
-  Programmable ring tone, volume, and cadence 
-  Country-specific menu guidance 
 
-  Benefits: -  Long-distance and toll calls can be transmitted over the IP  network, reducing communication costs. 
-  Integrating voice and data into one network means investment  in one technology and one support organization, reducing infrastructure  costs. 
-  Software updates and feature enhancements can be downloaded  quickly and easily, thus enabling cost-effective upgrades. 
-  Intuitive, interactive menu keys and displays along with  simple dialing capabilities save time. 
-  Direct-dial keys are programmable, providing ease of  use. 
-  OptiPoint 100 advance telephone automatically stores the  numbers of the last 20 unanswered calls. 
-  Excellent voice quality in both hands-free and open  listening modes using special digital signal processor (DSP) technology and  acoustic algorithms for echo cancellation. 
 
The Siemens IP phones can be upgraded with software (a good  feature in a highly volatile technical environment). Other examples of IP  telephones include InterPhone by DSG Technology and Cisco's IP phone 7960 (see Exhibit 2). Cisco's IP  phone can also accept firmware updates via download.
 Exhibit 2: Cisco IP Phone 7960 (Courtesy of  Cisco Systems.)   When evaluating IP telephony solutions, voice quality is obviously  critical. A standard measure, MOS (mean  opinion score), is used by the industry to determine the subjective quality of  the telephone conversation. The ranking is from 1 (very bad) to 5 (perfect,  undistorted toll quality sound). One firm, NetIQ, has a well-developed  monitoring system, VoIP Assessor, that allows simulation of VoIP traffic and an  assessment of its quality. According to a recent Business  Communications Review article, "The Assessor software measures delay, packet  loss and jitter, and produces a report showing call quality by day of week,  location, network cause, etc. …There's been years and  years of research that went into that ITU standard, so it really is a fairly  scientific answer: You run this kind of traffic through this network with the  parameters you told us, and here's what call quality's going to sound like."  Call quality is expressed as MOS.
 One clear indicator of the direction of the industry is the fact  that Sprint, a major long-distance carrier, has decided to build out all its  local telephone service using VoIP technology. Certainly the older technologies  will co-exist for years, but the world is moving quickly to a fabric of  interlacing packets that will carry information without regard to its original  form.